This might have been the most impressive of the presentations this year, wowing even Avatar-weary watchers with its arithmetic complexities. But, dagnabit! Is it even relevant in the age of Supreme-Court protected "fleeting expletives," when even good, Christian boys like Bono have us all asking "I know about Miss Jackson (since I'm nasty), but godurn, man, U2?" |
Gibson explores the notion that, rather than being destructive to a future leader, scandal is an absolute necessity, humanizing the otherwise inhumane (which is the other necessity of leadership, somewhat paradoxically). Thus we should all know what our VIPs look like in their BVDs. It worked great for Slick Willie and for the (en)titled Italian PM, but why can't Sanford, Edwards, and Gore ride the salacious rocket back into our hearts? Gibson's otherwise helpful tear-out worksheets simply don't tell you when you've gone too far. |
It opined up my mime. |
The Brits are ambiguous about their relationship with the
Continent—always have been. But is their intransigence
to fully join an oddly hormonal shock to the system, the stimulus
the EU needs to finally succeed? Tazer's conclusions aren't
conclusive, but they grow on you slowly, and will do little
to tarnish his sterling reputation. |
// function example |
Who knew Ward Churchill's chickens would be doing a two-step when they came home to roost? |